The Reddit Protest Is Finally Over. Reddit Won
gizmodo.com
gizmodo.com
- losing it’s most passionate advocates and users;
- driving whole communities to its competitors (federated and discord specifically);
- just utterly shredding managements credibility with their users;
- and inspiring a generation of entrepreneurs to engage in building platforms to supplant replace them that definitely would not otherwise exist.
So much winning. Gold star for everyone involved. Case study on how to manage community forthcoming.
The only traffic I send Reddit's way is through search engine SEO, and if I can't find a good enough answer I simply join a Discord instead of creating a post in the subreddit. I have a hunch that if Discord ever decides to prioritize its communities being discoverable through search engines, Reddit is in even deeper trouble than it already is.
How many users left? It also might be filtering some of the more obnoxious users. Once a brand hits a critical mass that doesn't always matter. Think of everyone valve and facebook "alienated" over the years. Did it matter at all?
Reddit quite literally wants it's users to be "alienated" like other social media sites, because it goes with the territory of making money.
It's not like the reddit utopian dreams are still alive. Don't moderate, and you get racists, molesters, etc., and they tell everyone to drink the poison... what's the point anymore?
- driving whole communities to its competitors (federated and discord specifically);
Are these anywhere close to viable options? I haven't heard of federated, and discord is pretty bad for organizing public forums. It excels at group chat, not news discussions with very large groups.
- just utterly shredding managements credibility with their users;
I'm shocked it had any left to begin with. I suppose these are teh "noob users"? If you started ~2008-2012, none of this is surprising at all, and you have limited respect remaining for the platform... this was clear after the redesign, at the very latest.
- and inspiring a generation of entrepreneurs to engage in building platforms to supplant replace them that definitely would not otherwise exist.
How many new social media platforms have you seen of late? I wouldn't be surprised either way, but don't count on it.
- So much winning. Gold star for everyone involved. Case study on how to manage community forthcoming.
Case study that you should not try to be the good guy. These types of unpopular decisions should be made earlier. Reddit lost out on a lot of money by delaying the inevitable. Now it's very likely that it will take a greater reputational hit, because it didn't give up it's college fantasies quickly enough.
We all know the least successful companies are the ones that make these unpopular decisions... you know like: Apple, Facebook, Valve, insta, twitter, etc., etc. Wouldn't want to be like those losers!
Reddit has never been profitable and was never able to properly monetize the userbase they had. Killing their mobile app ecosystem only makes sense if they not only think that most of those users will be willing to switch to the dire official Reddit mobile app, but that doing so will turn Reddit's horrendous reputation around in advertising circles in time for their IPO.
I'm undecided on what the realistic attrition rate on the mobile side of Reddit is, but I think the chances of them becoming attractive to advertisers is almost nil. TikTok seems to be where social media managers are heading these days, and Threads/BlueSky are new opportunities on the horizon waiting to be pounced on. Meanwhile, Reddit is known as the legacy platform filled with users who hate advertising - why bother?
Do I matter? Probably not but I'd go out of my way to reply to weeks/months/years old comments to give updates and hopefully help the next person than landed there via a google search and I won't be doing that anymore. I'm sure reddit will be just fine without me but at some point you have to draw a line and here is where I drew mine.
I wish this lede wasn't buried. Reddit was always going to "win" any battle with the moderators - it's their platform, and they can be as nice or as nasty as they please. They might have trouble finding replacement moderators, especially if recent reporting is anything to go by, but the elephant in the room is that Reddit might not be viable as a business.
Twitter was at the very least treading water until it was loaded down with debt that put it in its current death spiral. Reddit seems to have lit a decade's worth of investment money on fire with precious little returns to show for it.
Reddit isn’t that valuable to me. I’ll probably download my comments from all my accounts and maybe train an LLM on them or something, but overall I’ve basically accomplished nothing on Reddit other than a couple posts to Data Is Beautiful.
But the eternal September people will remain on the enshittified legacy services until it's clear to them which direction to follow early adopters.
And do we even want that exodus to happen? Reddit and Twitter were never as good in recent years as they were when they were smaller.
Reddit had really pulled off something fantastic in building what is essentially a self-regulating community which is quite a feat. They caused significant damage to that foundation in the process of "winning". It's not immediate apparent or headline grabbing but the damage is there.
Replacement moderators are a dime a dozen if you ask for volunteers. But the skillset (and for lack of better word a certain obsessiveness) is not as common. Calling it a skillset is a bit rich, but can't think of a better word. It's a bit like walking into a canteen asking "who wants to be CEO" gets you lots of hands in the air, but concluding from that therefore CEOs are easily replacable doesn't quite follow.
Moderators aren't CEOs obviously but my point is the good ones tend to have something hard to quantify about them. Running roughshod over that was a strategic mistake imo that will impact long term quality.
Or maybe it'll remain below the surface long enough to IPO in which case perhaps it's not a strategic mistake for the existing investors...
This summer's loss wasn't as big a deal as the proportion of genuinely valuable contributors leaving is much smaller then the last exodus, and nearly all the affected subreddits are closer to the internet average, which being 2023 is filled with far more low value spam then the mid 2010s.
Where did they go?
The current wave of interesting users went to lemmy/kbin by the looks of it.
However, I also thought that Reddit unintentionally challenged people/organizations around the world to replace them. This will probably set off more serious competition in the future.
That's a short-term win that's not good for a social platform.
Reddit Live was a great place for gain massive instant audiences (20k-60k viewers) to feed primary other channels on Twitch, Youtube live, etc.
Lemmy, Mastodon, BlueSky and Tildes won.
edit: happytiger said it better. But yeah.
I know things always can get worse, but I can't help but laugh at complaints regarding quality. The mods on reddit are terrible.
HackerNews is not much better. Essentially, just another power broker that moderates based on it's own biases. However, I suppose they're more successful with their goals.