I think you should be less bullish on the "open source". As you kindly clarified for me the other day when I asked [1], only the client is open source. The back end is closed (that's Sweep back end, not the LLM which is obvious) and the product as a whole cannot be self-hosted by third parties.

That's fine (though not clear what the benefit is to developers who might want to contribute), but at the moment the impression being given is that this is an open source product.

Of course, if I have misunderstood I'll be happy to be corrected.

I wish you the best with it as this seems like a very cool product even if its closed at core - but a lack of clarity now may undermine reception and goodwill later.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36953720