I fully understand. This was my initial reaction too.
Thinking about this for a while, I have a different view: If rich people pay for this, it means their money goes into the pockets of people who operate (and own) such storage places.
The alternative would be to pass their wealth to their few and already privileged descendants.
Same about this "wealth" scary object being passed from one person to un-deserving heirs to the possible detriment of the rest of humanity. Who owns that wealth is very irrelevant: most of it is invested and very productive.
I believe the COO in the video alluded to expenses at the time of "resurrection" but I can't imagine any more than a stipend is there for the "Sleeper".
After that it's a technical issue of how you would attempt to transmit money to someone who died and was resurrected. Ideas in this directions would be things like trusts or foundations which purpose would be your potential eventual benefit. No idea what's the current goto method for this. For example very long term such entities are illegal in some parts of the world, but legal elsewhere.
This is thinking too much within system. I don't know why you should need to keep frozen meat to get those resources
> The alternative would be to pass their wealth to their few and already privileged descendants.
There are alternatives (and more egalitarian and less useless) to the existing system of mostly unbounded inheritance.