Could AI's BS be grounds to redefine human understanding? How we gauge AI's grokking is challenged by Searle's Chinese Room. What relevance does the stated outcome, for truth or for narrative, have in a coherent response?
LLM("AI")'s BS would seem to expand rather than completely redefine human understanding as it is only able to infer on what has been provided in the query and defined trained set. The second question on coherent responses seems unanswerable without the context of the query.