Conservative activist behind US affirmative action cases sues VC fund
reuters.com
reuters.com
1. we can put the wasted efforts of tribal cultural warfare behind us
2. we can have debates that may not and should not result in unanimous agreement without being disagreeable
3. voters are informed deeply about all issues and candidates presented before them from verified sources, not press releases from political operatives
4. Elimination of PACs
5. Private financing of political campaigns is either abolished or severed limited to small donations from named individuals to a particular candidate only. When funds go unused, they are fractionally returned to all donors
6. Prosecution of public officials who take thinly-veiled bribes and other considerations
For example: "voters are informed deeply about all issues and candidates presented before them from verified sources".
What does it mean for a voter to be "informed deeply about all issues and candidates"? How do you define that?
What do you do if a voter is not "informed deeply" -- prevent them from voting?
"verified sources" -- verified by whom? The fact-checkers at Snopes? What if I disagree with their standards for verification, of if they have some blatant political bias themselves? Okay, how about some "bipartisan" government committee? Who appoints the committee members?
etc. etc.
When their own political allies make their own gains, whether its by corruption, violence, intimidation, lies, defamation, or destruction, they will hide those actions, declare you should be outcast (or worse) if you believe they took place, or declare those actions were just and necessary.
Discussions about this topic usually happen with nobody bothering to verify, or even explicitly state, their assumptions about the demographics of Harvard/the Ivy League. Effectively arguing in the dark. Let's shed some light on the issue:
https://archive.org/details/ivy-league-demographics (And ask yourselves why such basic information was omitted from nearly all reporting)
The Supreme Court ruling involving Harvard and the University of North Carolina was a sharp setback to affirmative action policies often used to increase the number of Black, Hispanic and other underrepresented minority groups on campuses. - https://www.reuters.com/world/us/harvard-says-it-will-comply...
The inquiry into one of the nation’s richest and most prestigious universities will examine allegations by three liberal groups that Harvard’s practice of showing preference for the relatives of alumni and donors discriminates against Black, Hispanic and Asian applicants in favor of white and wealthy students who are less qualified. - https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/25/us/politics/harvard-admis...
But several studies have shown that legacy admissions overwhelmingly favor wealthy and White applicants, and critics have described the practice as reverse affirmative action — benefiting such students at the cost of applicants of color and other disadvantaged groups. - https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/07/28/legacy-a...
when the college admissions scandal, dubbed Operation Varsity Blues, crashed into headlines, it immediately became a showcase of white privilege. - https://time.com/5943645/varsity-blues-college-cheating-scan...
How elite US schools give preference to wealthy and white 'legacy' applicants - https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/23/elite-school...
And these strategies, which are legal, certainly help some types of applicants: A 2019 economic study found that recruited athletes, legacies, children of faculty and staff and kids of wealthy donors represented 43% of White admitted students at Harvard. - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/affirmative-action-harvard-supr...
Why Are Ivy League Schools Still Discriminating Against Asians? - https://www.newsweek.com/why-are-ivy-league-schools-still-di...
But even ignoring SAT scores (which, when they favor Whites, are dismissed as racist [1-6]), showing the true representation is not irrelevant - it serves to dispel the carefully curated false impression that Whites are over-represented at the expense of minorities, documented in my other comment.
[1] SAT math scores mirror and maintain racial inequity - https://www.brookings.edu/articles/sat-math-scores-mirror-an...
[2] For years, the SAT has come under attack for having a certain bent. From the Harvard Educational Review to the Princeton Review, the measurement tool has been called a "white preference test." - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sat-system-needs-reform_n_853...
[3] The History of the SAT Is Mired in Racism and Elitism - https://www.teenvogue.com/story/the-history-of-the-sat-is-mi...
[4] As our country grapples with its heritage of white supremacy, educators need look no further than the SAT for an example of how systemic racism perpetuates itself. - https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/views/2020/08/17/h...
[5] Dismantling White Supremacy Includes Ending Racist Tests like the SAT and ACT - https://www.tcpress.com/blog/dismantling-white-supremacy-inc...
[6] The California system has become the biggest and best-known American institution of higher education to step away from the use of the two major standardized tests, citing charges that they disadvantage students who are poor, black, and Hispanic. - https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/23/us/SAT-ACT-abolish-debate...
Only if the 12% is itself a random selection of the global pool, rather than selective by the same kind of criteria the schools use for other students.