If I may ask - why?
Why is increasing your code coverage to 100% matter? Would that reduce bugs or speed up development in any way?
Wouldn't it just add lots more code to maintain and make refactors more time consuming?
Why is increasing your code coverage to 100% matter? Would that reduce bugs or speed up development in any way?
Wouldn't it just add lots more code to maintain and make refactors more time consuming?
To put it another way, code coverage isn't a direct measure of how good your testing is, but it is still a useful metric to try and improve.
In most cases 100% is too hardcore a target, but you should probably aim for at least 80%.
(Shameless plug) I wrote a short post about this here: https://about.codecov.io/blog/the-case-against-100-code-cove...