I'm happy for an article like this that I can invite people to read. I often tell people that the "cloud" is a lock-in for subscription based everything, where you have literally no control of your data nor the slightest insight in to who can access it, where all privacy boils down to whether mega-corporations don't lie, and so many other compromises and shortcomings.

Most of the responses are, "but it works for me", "it's convenient", "I don't want to run my own servers", and/or, "everyone else is doing it", as though not using the cloud means all those things go away.

Many of these people genuinely don't care about privacy and completely lack the imagination to envision what could be done with their home security cameras' feeds, their Ring doorbells' feeds, the settings on their Nest and so on. Even when we have stories about assholes scaring the shit out of people via babycams, Amazon turning over Ring footage that the homeowner explicitly said not to, or houses getting burglarized because criminals knew the house was empty because the thermostat was set for vacation, people still seem to imagine these aren't the kinds of things that are rare and won't happen to them.

It reminds me of the early days of online credit card fraud and online phishing - people had a hard time realizing that it was more likely than they believed.

While most people's eyes will glaze over during the discussion of CRDTs, and while I can't wait to see more local tools that negate the need for "cloud" services, there's a lot in this article that can be pointed to when people might benefit from learning about possible long-term issues with the cloud.