It seems to be using the bibtex tags for the inline citations. They don't stand out clearly enough for my liking, and they also have me worried: have I ever used a tag for someones paper like "XXXnonsense" or "dumbassYYY"?? Knowing myself, well....
It seems to be using the bibtex tags for the inline citations. They don't stand out clearly enough for my liking, and they also have me worried: have I ever used a tag for someones paper like "XXXnonsense" or "dumbassYYY"?? Knowing myself, well....
And feel free to suggest better styling ideas as well. I keep wondering if we should have several themes emphasizing different elements...
https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/2303.05514
The references come inline and not well separated from the text (eg in square brackets) like this:
Recently the world was introduced to PYTHEUS Ruiz-Gonzalez et al. (2022); Arlt, Ruiz-Gonzalez, and Krenn (2022). Like his homophonic namesake, PYTHEUS is an explorer, who in just a few short years has already made new scientific discoveriesArlt, Ruiz-Gonzalez, and Krenn (2022)!
I suspect this is related to me using bibtex poorly in the original or something!
Anyway, great work overall, thanks again :)