A Fire Upon The Deep By Vernor Vinge (1992)
archive.org
archive.org
If anyone likes this book and hasn't read John C. Wright's The Golden Age series, I can't recommend it enough.
Another space opera I felt the same way about is Peter Hamilton's Commonwealth Saga. There's also a trilogy and some other novels set in the same universe. 99% of the fiction I read is space opera, and the Commonwealth universe is definitely my favorite. So action-packed and enthralling, couldn't put the books down. As a matter of fact — it's been a few years since I've read them, and I'm almost done with Lords of Uncreation, so I think I may read it again :)
That's a name I haven't heard in a while. I remember that his Awake in the Night was a fantastic reimagining of William Hope Hodgson's (terrible) The Night Land
1: https://archive.org/details/john-c-wright-awake-in-the-night
This story is chilling and hints at a deep viciousness of character, which unfortunately does come out quite a bit of you follow him further. http://www.sfsfss.com/stories2/guest-law.pdf
Still, the first 20 pages of the Golden Oecumene are so amazingly stylized and interesting, and the whole thing is great.
<spoiler>The merchants repeatedly find that once smart dust (tiny swarms of nanomachines) are developed, governments inevitably use them for ubiquitous surveillance, which inevitably causes societal collapse.<https://blog.regehr.org/archives/255></spoiler>
People always talk about the future Usenet and such, but this is the most important single insight of Vinge in the two books.
Anyway, I'm less curious about that now and more curious about the absolute eye blast this emacs picture is. I write short stories and grand adventures in Scrivener. I'm familiar with emacs, I don't use it or vi/m I'm an IDE person but this just.. I have no idea whats going on.
Is this an editor(s) and the author communicating via emacs notation? Like, what are these -
d2 -- editor? it/they/them seem to be making bullet points and spelling corrections. But then, what's PRB? What's ID?
CHK? d0 jrf?
then d2 comes back and does a d2 STOP and d2 START ??
CHK is back but it's CHK AFUD BKG
FRAG shows up
d0 jrf is back .. ok d0 jrf definitely sounds like an editor now
Well at the end here I think I answered my own question and these are various editors but if I'm wrong would love to hear. This looks like an absolute nightmare this is like.. 1 or 2 pages and that book was 624 pages. Also, reee, I bought that book in 2009. wow.
There's also out there a version of A Fire Upon the Deep that includes at least some of his annotations. I'll update with a link when I find it again.
Check out this thread [2] right here - it has a link to the annotated version on archive.org, and the discussion includes references to scripts to format it more nicely.
[1] http://www.norwescon.org/archives/norwescon33/vingeinterview...
I'm going through his archived file on this Hugo and Nebula Anthology 1993 which contains his annotated A Fire Upon the Deep - https://archive.org/details/hugo_nebula_1993
So far I'm only at his intro.rtf file - it's a weird mixture of .rtf and .txts I'm not sure the rhyme or reason yet.
Regardless the intro.rtf first page is this which does a little dive into his process https://i.imgur.com/HuhBOAk.png
I wonder if he's absolutely obsessed with Obsidian now or maybe he has an absolutely interesting emacs config.
edit: He just answered all of my questions on page 2.. wow. https://i.imgur.com/m2nO2Am.png
https://github.com/Gruntfuggly/todo-tree
edit: I'm reading comments posted above I had no idea that Vernor Vinge was a professor of math and compsci at sdsu. That explains quite a bit.
The 3 novels were published in 1992, 1999, and 2011. I wonder if Vinge is working on another one?
And for HN see especially "True Names":
> a 1981 science fiction novella by American writer Vernor Vinge, a seminal work of the cyberpunk genre. It is one of the earliest stories to present a fully fleshed-out concept of cyberspace, which would later be central to cyberpunk. The story also contains elements of transhumanism, anarchism, and even hints about The Singularity.
If you want to read his work, please buy a copy instead of using archive. Or borrow a copy from your local library. Authors still get royalties with libraries that use catalogs like Overdrive and Gardner, as most municipal libraries do.
Vinge is still with us and he deserves to get paid for his work.
But maybe there was more to it?
By contrast, the meaning of the title of the sequel "a deepness in the sky" is fairly literal once you get to know more about the alien species and their habits.
I think both books would have been far better as novellas, and not dragged out into 800 pages, with a lot of frankly pointless meandering storylines.
But I suppose for modern sci-fi it's better than nothing.
Are there any up and coming or recent space opera people I should be reading?
Look around you. Are any of your friends/peers capable of producing literary works that are anywhere close to the work of Asimov, Simak, Heinlein, Garrison, Anderson, etc.?
The tech is already here, and the optimism of the flying car is gone. We see now that peak tech is used for nothing more than to sell more ads and make a paragraph of text eat 500MB RAM to "securely" display in your browser. Only after you 2FA to log in of course.
I think that many SF readers are way too dominated by nostalgia.
A friend of mine, the writer Ian Sales, has commented on this very effectively:
https://iansales.com/2008/08/21/dont-look-back-in-awe/
Further developed, 5Y later, here:
http://www.nerds-feather.com/2013/11/guest-post-why-i-turned...
These are a tier below Stephenson, Weir, and the Children of Time books, but if you're through those, these two would be my next picks.
This book and its prequel share pacing, plot flow/tension, and character archetypes, but differ significantly in the environments and levels of technology they describe. A Fire is more mystical and fantasy, while the prequel is more Scifi. If you enjoy one, it's likely you'll enjoy the other. I'm enjoying the setting and conflict more in A Deepness personally.
Vinge and Stephenson at their best are peers.
Tschaikovsky is not in their league yet, I don't think, and Weir far, far below...
Refer to Clarke's third law.