#828282 on #f6f6ef is only a 3.54:1 contrast ratio, well below the WCAG's 4.5:1 minimum for body text. Even on a pure white background it's only 3.84:1.
#828282 on #f6f6ef is only a 3.54:1 contrast ratio, well below the WCAG's 4.5:1 minimum for body text. Even on a pure white background it's only 3.84:1.
I get the reluctance to change HN and appreciate the consistency. But, in good faith, this one is a clear accessibility issue that needs to be addressed. I think a change to just get the contrast to minimal best-practices/standards would't compromise the platform.
Devil's advocate against myself for a sec: HN is a site largely used by engineers/technical professionals. We can be an insufferable bunch, especially in regards to change. Maybe the social fallout isn't worth the change and I just would't have the data/context to understand that...? Just throwing it out there. I may just not understand.
Edit: except it can’t be, since HN doesn’t actually allow downvotes on posts, only comments.
I don't know why. It's awful.
I believe when I highlight a comment, the highlighting makes the background be a lightish blue. pick a highlight/text color that contrasts better with that?
Adding a way to get to the next root comment would be awesome.
The nice part is the HN “remembers“ collapsed threads next time you load the thread so you can continue to ignore them.
If someone jumped on an implementation - no more needed :)