so it would mean that half of the dna might still be available after 1M years
Some interesting work in the many contexts where half-life works would be to say what the Markov property says about the mechanism of the decay or whatever are trying to predict in the context.
The DNA we get back from old situations typically was preserved, by dryness/freezing, and it's still quite fragmentary. The actual "half life" of DNA is not that interesting- its the details of the DNA remnants that matter.
This recent news article suggests nematodes actually surviving after 46K years in permafrost. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/46-000-year-old-w...
This isn't really "frozen animals" and everything was sort of mixed together so they had to compare remaining fragments to existing sequences:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/07/science/oldest-dna-greenl...
[0] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/21/russian-scient...