We've also been using the term Machine Learning for a long time to try to avoid this. Using "AI" where "ML" would suffice is just trying to cash in on recent hype for clicks.
Still an interesting result of course.
Still an interesting result of course.
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=artificial+int...
This is from published books, so probably less affected by popular narratives. For that, we have Google Trends!
It looks like they trade places repeatedly when constrained to news searches: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?cat=5&date=all_2008...