I doubt it. Michael F. Holick is probably the biggest vitamin d proponent and he has gained notoriety for having received a lot of money from companies making vitamin d supplements, as well as having done some wild stuff, such as defending abusive parents in court on the theory that children's broken bones are a result of vitamin d deficiency:

> In one case of a child who had suffered broken bones in which Holick defended the accused parent, the child later went on to suffer severe brain injury, for which the parent has been indicted.

as well as this interesting theory:

> Holick has speculated that the dinosaurs may have died of rickets and osteomalacia caused by a lack of vitamin D in reduced sunlight

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_F._Holick

and the only repercussion he has faced was the place he works not allowing him to treat children anymore.

If he hasn't had his medical license revoked I doubt any doctor simply recommending vitamin d would have theirs revoked.

No. My memory of the news stories were that some doctors preached it as a miracle preventative/cure, which let to patients neglecting other more effective preventatives because they thought they were safe from getting sick.

I think any doctor would tell you to take supplements if your lab tests showed that you're low. There's nothing controversial in that advice.

My wife’s OBGYN endorses homeopathy. You have to kill someone or question covid vaccines to lose your license in this country.

For a long time, the Mayo Clinic claimed vitamin D supplementation to combat SARS infections had no scientific proof and was possibly dangerous.

If such an authoritative source claims pseudo science and danger, your annecdote could very well be true.

source: recently retired US Registered Nurse