One in five Texans lives in a floodplain, state’s first-ever analysis shows
texastribune.org
texastribune.org
So you may live in a flood plane and you have an unreliable power grid? What else?
https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/homeowners-...
A couple of major hurricanes and a lot of these so-called insurance companies will fold up like a wet rag.
I'd argue there is a bit of an anti fragility element here. The fact that the approximate black swan event did occur absolutely forced changes throughout. I'd agree things are probably still not ideal but the power grid is about engineering and tradeoffs.
Consider this game theory: Why would Samsung continue to aggressively construct semiconductor factories in Taylor, TX after having suffered a 7-8 figure wafer scrap incident due to the very same grid outage? I can assure you of one thing: There is no way in hell they are running those factories using standby generation, UPS, etc.
1) No connection to outside grids for backup capacity. Have to maintain that dream of seceding from the union.
2) Their "free market" real time power auction punishes any provider who tries to plan for reserve capacity and extreme events. They are sure to lose out in this auction to those that don't.
3) During extreme events, power prices spike through the roof so people couldn't pay their bill even if they had power. But now government has interfered in this "free market" and set limits on this. Communists!
https://www.kltv.com/2021/02/18/gov-greg-abbott-provide-upda...
...the Governor announced he is requesting a Major Disaster Declaration — which includes Individual Assistance, Public Assistance, and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program — from the White House.
What's truly absurd to me is thanks to (I hear) outsized influence from builders on city and county government and little to no zoning laws, we've seen development in reservoirs that were previously runoff areas! I mean I remember the flooding that happened after Alicia and driving by the flooded and closed Addicks Reservoir. Fast forward thirty years, and that same area was developed and subsequently flooded by Harvey.
Unfortunately only now the Army Corps of Engineers is saying they'll settle claims with homeowners in the area but only at the expense of granting the ACE a flooding easement, when the ACE should have had the power to block development and leave that land as a catchment in the first place.
Insurance of last resort is steadily increasing in price. So like property taxes, it will eventually price people out.
In the three years leading up to Harvey, I believe there were three incidents where waters overflowed the bayou, but none of the storms since then have done that (and there have been some significant ones). But it is of course entirely possible that there just hadn’t been the right pattern of rainfall since Harvey that marked the prior instances of flooding.
The other part that sucks is inheritances. Then the price is not re-evaluated. Now you have people sitting on a $2,000,000 house with a value of 200,000.
Also, it's not the NIMBYs stopping unchecked development.
He set up a task force to look into flood insurance. They came up with recommendations and one of them was "under no circumstances should it be subsidized"
To grow in the littoral, Johnson pushed it with subsidies
Or are some still clinging to their fallback theory --- that increasing CO2 levels have nothing to do with it? Pulling billions of tons of carbon out of the ground every year and burning it in the atmosphere is totally irrelevant?
Right wing politics is rooted in magic and magical thinking. But realty is nothing if not persistent.
Thinking otherwise is just "magical thinking".