Some alloys don't change size when heated – recent work on why
caltech.edu
caltech.edu
Invar, a nickle-iron alloy, was commercially highly relevant for accuracy of mechanical watch balance springs in the 19th century. Investigations of that presumably lead to the 1920 Nobel in physics.
The article claims to produce the first equation to model this effect accurately, together with an experimental technique to validate the main components. This would support in-silico material exploration, esp. predictions for high temperatures that induce expansion.
But because this demonstrates phase shifts in how electrons interact, the significance could be broader that just the use of constant-size invar (iron/nickel alloy).
Paper excerpts:
----
Here we use a thermodynamic Maxwell relation to explicitly separate the contributions to thermal expansion from phonons and spins. [...] These two contributions were measured by nuclear resonant X-ray scattering on Invar under pressure. We find that a competition with phonons is necessary to complete the explanation of the near-zero thermal expansion of Invar.
An advantage to [our] equation is that the two main components of thermal expansion—phonon and magnetic—can be experimentally obtained by nuclear resonant X-ray scattering
Excellent agreement between experiment and theory is found. There is a remarkable spin–lattice coupling, and a precise cancellation of the phonon and spin contributions that causes the anomalously low thermal expansion in Invar near ambient conditions of T and P. Furthermore, the transition to a more typical thermal expansion at higher pressures is shown to arise from the magnetic transition to the paramagnetic state that quenches the negative contribution from the spin system. Finally, the electronic contribution is found to have only a small effect on thermal expansion.
> There is, however, a class of metal alloys called Invars (think invariable), that stubbornly refuse to change in size and density over a large range of temperatures.
with the addition of cobalt it becomes Kovar, a metal that is common for telescope use or joints where metal bonds to glass.
they're all fairly proprietary and expensive. I've used Invar a lot in the production of heated press platens.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_thermal_expansion
Are there any other cases where magnetism is responsible for something this subtle?
The strength of the magnetic field is encoded in how broadly the line is split, allowing us to make spatially-resolved maps of the magnetic field of the Sun ("magnetograms").
Like getting the chemical composition of the emitting surface of the Sun, it's the kind of thing you'd think sounds impossible until some clever physicist figures out how to exploit it.
See the little animation at the top of the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeeman_effect
As for applications, it probably won't be garden variety appliances, thermal expansion isn't much of an issue there and designs for all of the things you mentioned have been tweaked a hundred years ago to deal with thermal expansion (although railroad tracks are still an issue sometimes). And of course there's other parameters, like wear resistance; nickel is a pretty soft metal I believe.
But, things like precision industry or space will find a use for this. Sattelites have to deal with hundreds of degrees of temperature variation.
It may be solved in principle, but certainly not in practice.
Now consider a space elevator. Material problems are a game stopper.
Matching CTE is a big deal in careful engineering. "Alloy 42" is a great example of that in action: it's an invar-like alloy with its CTE matched to silicon, so chip lead frames expand with silicon dies as they heat up during operation. Not that many things use lead frames anymore....
I've seen it used for low temp things or tooling but for that reason it can't be used for anything really high temperature.
> That anomalous behavior makes these alloys useful in applications where extreme precision is required, such as in the manufacture of parts for clocks, telescopes, and other fine instruments.
They're also squirrely when wet, and if you've ever ridden across one on a bike or a motorcycle, they are fucking terrifying because you can see the river below you, and the railings for some reason tend to be very low.
And while I understand that many bridges don't really prevent runoff into the water flowing beneath them, metal mesh bridges really can't.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/4d/82/91/4d8291e022bd14c87985...
I know that picture is a mesh, I thought it had the best detail, but they're on paved bridges too:
https://siamagazin.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/23h32h-min...
I agree though that both the thermal coefficient of the teeth probably don't impact their performance (the expansion in the teeth relative to the width of the gap is negligible, so we can probably pretend we're using expansionless teeth already), and I've never had an accident on one of these bridges, but I'm sure you're right and that the mesh concentrates the force on your bones like a golf club.
A rule of the thumb with bridges is that the movements (thermal expansion/contraction + elongation or contraction due to loads + in case of pre-stressed concrete fluage/creep) is in the range of 6-9 mm every 10 m.
Expansion joints on (long) continuous beam bridges can thus need to have very large displacement, up to 1,200-1,400 mm are relatively common.
This isn't just a problem on bridges. Guardrails in shopping malls seem to come up to thigh height, well below a normal person's center of gravity. I hate it and I can't understand who thought that would be a good idea.
I want guardrails that -- if I should happen to be propelled into them -- will stop me from falling over the side. Not rails that will tip me over headfirst.
Just between you and me, fuuuuuck those metal grates on bridges. I'm grateful that I have almost always had the opportunity to get onto a good sidewalk/path instead of navigating a bridge with an 'interesting' surface.
For precision instruments you probably want devices that have exactly the same modulus of expansion as what you are cutting. So that 0.15m is always 0.15m no matter the temperature of the factory.
For molds you would want the outer mold to shrink slower than the molded material, but would you perhaps not want an inner mold to shrink faster? So that the material pulls away from both as it cures/cools (I'm asking, I don't know)?
I would guess that comparatively huge thermal characteristics from the churning and moving of the crust and mantle due to plate tectonics probably overshadows this.