> Who exactly are you to judge what she should or shouldn't be proud of ?
It's not about what "she" specifically should be proud of. It's about all of us, employees and our relationship to management.
> She goes as far as adding a full explanation that you - conveniently - redacted
I literally said, "You should read it for yourself before commenting here. (Word count is 2413 in case you're wondering.)" So the comment about conveniently redacting seems a bit absurd.
> You do not have to share same work ethics as she does and you don't have to make the same choices.
Nobody who knows me has ever questioned my work ethic. But speaking of ethics, I feel that it's unethical for management to ask for, encourage, or condone this kind of needless personal sacrifice by employees. Management deadlines are nearly always totally arbitrary and only benefit management, not the employees.
I also noted that it's counterproductive, individually. You can't win a marathon by running a series of sprints.
> But you have absolutely no right to take it away from her or to dictate what she can be proud of or happy with.
You're making this way too personal. It's intended to be general advice, directed not toward Crawford, who isn't here (I don't think?) but rather to the readers of this comment. The problematic aspect of what Crawford said is the public glorification of needless sacrifice, not whether she specifically is (currently) personally happy or proud of it.
By the way, note that the infamous sleeping bag photo was infamous precisely because she posted it publicly for everyone, as some kind of model for work. And she was after all a manager, setting an example for others. It wasn't just a private photo she took for her album at home that she could look back on later and reminisce fondly about "the good old days".