One more in the endless parade of examples of the fact that Open Source is meaningless. It's Free Software methodology with ethics stripped from it, and therefore is malleable in its meaning to the point that it has none.
Given that the FSF plays games to pretend the GFDL is a Free license when it really shouldn't be, in practice Open Source is preferable to Free Software.
This situation is like cryptography in the early web. Some governments shut it down for domestic use and inadvertantly enabled weakness in their own infrastructure. Will governments hinder the development of AI in the same way?
Let them defend Open Source all they like, I could give a shit. I'll be over here defending Free Software.
[edit: ...which actually means something.]