Mathematics in Movies
people.math.harvard.edu
people.math.harvard.edu
They're all supposed to be math geniuses, but very early on in the movie they take forever to decide if 645 or 372 are prime numbers... It kind of killed the suspension of disbelief for me right there...
https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/6358/story-of-grothe...
Could be totally apocryphal, but I like the sentiment.
holy X
I get accused at having a poor memory A LOT!.
And I constantly tell people, I have a great memory - there are just things I dont choose to commit to memory.
I can tell you every single password I have typed into a machine. FblQ00Ho <--- ix.netcom.com 1996
But I cant tell you WHAT YOU TOLD ME you ate for lunch yesterday and suddenly I am a jerk.
"Why cant you recall what I told you yesterday??!?!?!?"
UH, because thats ephemeral information I dont need to hold in my head?
but I haven't seen that movie in many years, so I don't remember what he knows
but the actual test was 9 digits? (if i recall well)
I 'memorized' the first 31 primes! why? I'm not sure; but I know how I did it, I don't know what it means tho
The last digit of a prime bigger than 5 can only be 1, 3, 7 and 9.
also, you're focused on base 10. And that 1,3,7,9 is the basis of the how i remember them: 11,13,17,19 then 23 AND ALSO 101,103,107,109, and then 113. but why!?
I learned that all twin primes in base 4 either end in 1 xor 3. and I know that all primes congruent to 1 modulo 4 can factorized into a complex number with its conjugate (Gaussian primes). But I don't understand this, I only 'know it'
And then, I figured that all the twin primes in base 6 are always end in 5 then in 1. and that's it, this is supposed to be a question by the way
I think I gotta somehow get a better understanding of Mersenne and Eisenstein primes, but I don't like jumping through 'bureaucratic'-academic hoops to get things explained to me. it's only numbers, I have other things to do
but the numbers are not (only) how they're written down!
meh...
does this answer your question? if not, maybe this can help: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdOtR2A5agc
I.e
999999999999995%5=0 999999999999992%2=0
Thus they are not prime numbers.
David Saltzberg, a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of California, Los Angeles, checked scripts and provided dialogue, mathematics equations, and diagrams used as props.[4] According to executive producer/cocreator Bill Prady, "We're working on giving Sheldon an actual problem that he's going to be working on throughout the [first] season so there's actual progress to the boards ... We worked hard to get all the science right."[5] Saltzberg, who has a Ph.D. in physics, served as the science consultant for the show for six seasons and attended every taping.[23] He saw early versions of scripts that needed scientific information added to them, and he also pointed out where the writers, despite their knowledge of science, had made a mistake. He was usually not needed during a taping unless a lot of science, and especially the whiteboard, was involved: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Bang_Theory
classic compilation of "Let's enhance" - https://youtu.be/LhF_56SxrGk
Nothing will beat NCIS though - for example where they 'enhanced' a picture where a reflection in an eyeball.
NCIS was scifi ahead of its time.
Some studio hired a non-idiot consultant for once.
!!
I knew¹ people who won't touch SciFi or anything that they think remotely whiffed of it, parrot because it was "unrealistic", yet lapped up NCIS and similar. Always amused me.
--
[1] Not so much now, science fiction seems to be more acceptable to a wider audience
0 - https://www.theregister.com/2003/05/16/matrix_sequel_has_hac... 1 - https://nmap.org/movies/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkkmtkAO4p0
Disarming a nuclear bomb with excel
I love math, just can't seem to grasp it. Going on 40 years now....
As math consultant to "A Beautiful Mind" I waited six hours so Russell Crowe could ask me where to look when he declared that Jennifer Connelly's solution to the blackboard problem was wrong. He cared about details. Then Jennifer asked me if I was making her look like a yahoo. I explained that in testing a professor had given her answer.
Various people get wigged out that the young student in the late library scene was spouting math that was well known. Um, ever been a student? I'd made this same observation to Barry Mazur in the hallway as a student, and he just grinned, "It's all connected!" Meanwhile, no one addressed my partial proof of the Riemann Hypothesis that Nash had left on a board.
In the Harvard Lecture Hall scene, Nash compared space-time to the quaternions. Um, he was about to be institutionalized? I knew I had to use this line after the look Brian Greene gave me when I tried it on him. Still, it bothers critics.
Ron Howard found it helpful to think of the math as an actor. That was great direction for me.