> That begs the question, presuming that voting on a decentralized platform is good.
A decentralized platform is verifiable and less prone to being rigged. All that's missing is proof of personhood.
> Decentralized governance and decentralized UBI in general.
Governance on decentralized platform can typically be approached via a few ways:
- weighting votes by compute power
- weighting votes by volume of ownership (eg of a coin)
- weighting votes by number of identities/wallets
The first two only serve the rich (the people that can afford GPU farms or equity), and will lead to an oligarchy.
The last doesn't work because one person can create infinite accounts (eg public/private key pairs.)
The last, however, can work if one person can only ever be linked to one account.
> “Privacy for the normal people!” Oh, I can’t imagine that starting a firestorm (and for good reason).
You are picking a really tiny edge case and saying the entire system can't work because of this.
You aren't considering the possibility that the edge case can be adequately resolved with enough thought and investment.