It is, but if we could distribute some currency globally and equitably that at least takes it one step towards being a real currency, at least in theory.
So what, we can have a larger base of people negatively impacted when it inevitably falls over?
Bitcoin is the best bet at doing that. Otherwise, what's your better idea than bitcoin to distribute such a coin in such a way?
No, because it is based on false scarcity. Ponzi schemes reward those who get into it early and rob money from those who join the scheme later.
Bitcoin cannot exist as real currency unless it has some real concrete value backing it. That concrete value needs to exist in tangible form for it to be stable.