How much of that is attributed to the value of his worthless brand? Also Forbes is a rag that idolizes the wealthy.
So? Is it incorrect anywhere else, because that'd be an indicator that it's wrong here. Otherwise your unfavorable opinion of it is meaningless to the discussion.
You idolize Apple.
> How much of that is attributed to the value of his worthless brand?
I don't know, but I think most of it is probably real estate. Also, can his brand really be called "worthless" if its worth billions of dollars?