The reason education costs are screaming out of control in secondary education is because the government isn't responsible for student loans but students are and they have no opportunity to discharge to bankruptcy and there are no normal consumer debt protections for them. It's guaranteed free money for universities without any underwriting process and an albatross on the neck of the middle class.
Tuitions will remain high for as long as they have students desperate or ignorant enough to make poor financial choices.
The sad part is that this continues despite universities largely not meeting society's needs nor the needs of the students.
I would reference the confirming NAIS studies as well but they've got some self-interest in those results.
the data is very very old (20 years), but they did not find significant differences after adjusting for the schools / students characteristics. Unadjusted scores however do look better for private schools.
https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/dashboards/schools_dashboa...
Private schools outperform in nearly all subjects.
Do you have any evidence private schooling is bad? This is the first time I've heard it's worse than public school.
Is this a result of the private schooling or does the socioeconomic status of their parents play a significant role?
I attended both and the people that were rich enough to attend private school but were sent to public school anyway still did very well for themselves, not obviously different from those that attended private school.
This assumes a lot of facts not in evidence. In general schools that accept vouchers generally operate on much smaller per-student budgets (especially if you include the capital budget -- buildings and facilities) than public schools do. In many voucher states, the public school gets some level of funding for a student even a parent gets a voucher and sends their child somewhere else.
They can and do raise my property taxes, but it's much harder than colleges simply demanding higher and higher tuitions.