Also, I really don't care about devices becoming thicker because that's a non-issue these days. They are too slim for their own good. My iPhone SE 2 bends in my pocket.
Also, I really don't care about devices becoming thicker because that's a non-issue these days. They are too slim for their own good. My iPhone SE 2 bends in my pocket.
Basically it provides output signal to data cable so you don't need HDMI receiver for computer.
My nikon has replaceable batteries and the connectors are standard. as far as I knew, dslrs and even new mirrorless cameras all have user replaceable batteries
But of course the EU with it’s usual cluelessness won’t address that issue first
https://www.androidauthority.com/eu-smartphone-updates-rules...
The "web experience" was infinitely better before ads and tracking infested everything.
When was this mythical time the web wasn’t ad ridden? Do you not recall the pop up camera ads and the punch the monkey banner ads?
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/04/the-f...
The x10 pop up windows were ubiquitous by 2001
Seems like ages ago. Webrings and link directories. Every page was hand-made by a passionate human, for other passionate humans, about subjects they cared about.
Now it's 99.99% ads, tracking, engagement, spam, link farms, generated garbage, outrage, and now AI nonsense.
There's so little to bookmark (i.e. care about) that browsers dropped support for bookmarks. Just think about that. No place worth remembering nor revisiting anymore.
That's bullshit. I have been in the room when tech teams have had a good hard look at their databases, and set expiry polices on old tracking data. Why? GDPR compliance. The knock-on effects in data leaks that never happened is large.
Characterising GDPR as merely bureaucracy and cookie banners is shallow and wrong.
I don't think that you know anything about the subject. Please do not repeat this nonsensical claim.
The thing is, if you're not a EU citizen or resident then the benefits are not for you, that's how legal jurisdiction works. So then, do you argue from meanness: it doesn't benefit me, so we should get rid if and the way that it benefit's others, or from inclusion: Why can't my legal jurisdiction have something similar?
You also have to ask yourself, if all you know is some reaction involving sites putting up cookie banners, from way outside; why you would consider yourself well informed enough to reach a conclusion that "that's all they did", and share it.
Very well, actually.
>All they did was made the web experience worse with cookie pop up banners.
That was not the GDPR. The GDPR does not talk about cookies anywhere.
It's the ePrivacy Directive (from 2002, amended in 2009) that deals with cookies (or any type of storage on an end user's device). It's the ePD that says if you set cookies and it's not strictly necessary to provide the service then you must get consent.
The only change the GDPR made in this area was tightening up the definition of "consent" to actually mean consent and not merely lack of disapproval.