My job currently demands Oracle Linux.
I could choose Red Hat if I wanted to.
As I don't like software audits and license key activation, I do not choose it, as these are not a concern with Oracle Linux (unlike some of their other products).
I could choose Red Hat if I wanted to.
As I don't like software audits and license key activation, I do not choose it, as these are not a concern with Oracle Linux (unlike some of their other products).
Good news https://access.redhat.com/articles/simple-content-access
Counter offer: nah... how about I just target+deploy on any of the numerous competitors that don't make me jump through ANY licensing hoops whatsoever from here on out.
You went with the distro cloned by the company that perfected the concept?
In about 2007, we bought our first Red Hat to migrate functionality away from HP-UX. We eventually rolled the license that we purchased on a credit card into the corporate account.
In about 2009, "yum update" stopped working, and I called Red Hat, where I learned that corporate had terminated the licensing. Investigating, they advised me to run the Oracle converter, and resume pulling patches.
In 2013, corporate again switched to Red Hat. I did not. Corporate has been audited. I have not.
I'm using some btrfs loopback mounts with the UEK, and sales calls with Red Hat expressed extreme distaste for this.
At this point, why would I go back?
w/r/t btrfs - I recall when it was deprecated from tech preview in RHEL. I know some users really, really wanted it and it keeps popping up - Fedora is now using it, but I am skeptical that it's going to make it into RHEL anytime soon given that it was in RHEL as a tech preview and then pulled. I know SUSE supports it, I have a NAS that uses it, but seems like it's been found to be wanting by some of the folks who decide what gets into RHEL and doesn't.