I tried Bard and it feels worse than GPT-4, it doesn't follow the prompt very well. Uploading an invoice it failed to extract data, instead it responded with hallucinations.
I personally find this type of “safety“ to be patronizing and insulting, but I’m sure there are people who would prefer government regulation banning the use of language models for various and sundry “inappropriate” questions in order to protect humans who have no common sense. Anyway, in this condition, Bard’s a no for me.
Are you sure about this specifically? I’ve recently had zero trouble getting GPT-4 to give potential diagnoses for a given set of symptoms, though perhaps it’s an issue of prompting.
But, Bard can give you images as an output as well with the links to those images which may or may not be the correct links and GPT 3.5 can't do that. Still, in any general case, I'd say GPT 3.5 is way more reliable than Bard.
Also take a peek at which institution most of the ToT authors are at.
1: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.10601.pdf 2: https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-io-2023-keynote-sun... 3: https://www.wired.com/story/google-deepmind-demis-hassabis-c...