The tiling WM ecosystem in particular is thriving on Wayland with sway and hyprland, and I personally haven't had any issues with screen recording with OBS (I use hyprland).
Most of the stuff said in the list you linked is "said-X11-only software is not compatible with Wayland" but nothing is said about alternatives : for example instead of redshift I use gammastep.
For example, I wanted to create a tool to use my old smartphone as a trackpad. After a short time I realized my approach won't work on wayland. I started delving in the available options, /dev/uinput, libevdev etc., and realized it will be to much pain. No (generic) accessibility¹ support means no generic way to do that, and just for my setup it is too much work.
So I dropped that. Then I have a set of tools I use for quite some time, amongst which are AnyDesk, TeamViewer, Blue Recorder, Steam. These either don't work, work only with wlroots, or work via the X11 shim.
¹ for me just a nuisance, for all the people who really need accessibility support, well ...
Depends.
Screen tearing gets worse at higher refresh rates and resolutions under Xorg.
Additionally fractional scaling and mixed DPI's are something Xorg was having great difficulty supporting.
It also gets quite slow (high CPU and especially memory transfers) at high refresh rates and resolutions; I mean, you benefit from this without noticing.
You'll notice a loss in functionality (like screen recording) much more than you'll see a benefit like "this will actually work at 8k 120Hz"; but it's not true that there's no gains.
Wayland is fine, it fixes a lot of legacy that holds the ecosystem back, people don't like it overwhelmingly because changing esoteric and hacky software that is core to basically everything will be difficult and take time.
It might shock you to know though that GNOME and Fedora users are already using Wayland on the popular distros, the transition was completely seamless for those users.
On the other hand, my points still stand I think. And regarding esoteric and hacky software: I don't think accessibility as a base functionality should require hacky and esoteric stuff, it should be a first class citizen in a 2023 window manager (?).
And I also want to remind how Linux (and, ironically, Microsoft) grew so strong: they are really, really careful with deprecating old stuff. As hacky that stuff may be. Up for debate if this is net good, sure.
It should be, but linux is built by hobbyists in their free time — it is hard enough to get to a working state, let alone adding accessibility, even if it is the first on the list.
No, it gets better, the same as aliasing does with higher resolution. That, and VRR hardware in the monitor, are the correct way to fix tearing in this day and age. V-sync is kludgey false dharma.
> It might shock you to know though that GNOME and Fedora users are already using Wayland on the popular distros, the transition was completely seamless for those users.
Sure, but it might shock you how much smoother your desktop can be if you disable compositing (on X, anyway). Many never have, and you can't in GNOME (of course). ;D I'm not sure if Wayland supports that in itself, however.
It's only a wlroots protocol for now, and I won't deny that this is definitely one of the fields that still need some more refinement/stabilisation.