From reading I've done regarding previous cooling and warming cycles. But thanks for trolling.
And your response is useful. “From reading”.
Relative to tens of thousands of scientists of diverse fields, educational backgrounds, affiliated institutions, geographical regions, areas of study, environments of study, experimental approaches, data sources, mathematical analysis, and lots of reading, etc. basing a contrarian view on some reading is inadequate as a credible rebuttal.
For the most part, people on this site are looking for greater insight, not greater expression of personal opinions.
The comment OP called trolling would be much stronger and more interesting if it posted a "credible rebuttal" instead of being snarky and rude. If that hits an issue with the bullshit asymmetry principle[1] for you, downvote and move on with your life.
I see your points but this comes over very low on the snarky scale to me. More Socratic.
It is also a point (expertise matters) that seems to be especially overlooked in climate change discussions.
I also didn’t see how downvoting someone for not picking up on a point helps anything.
And I don’t see anything written to be unkind. Directness isn’t unkindness.