Am I wrong? Do hiring managers like to see this style of resume?
Am I wrong? Do hiring managers like to see this style of resume?
The first time it landed me a job, I eventually went to introduce myself to the CTO and he said “oh I know who you are, you’re the guy with the manpage CV”.
allocating a literal third of space to a self-rated list of skills is kinda bad move, it might seem like you're trying to be honest but to me it speaks ego problems, and that you're too focused on tools instead of solving problems at hand. I would much rather prefer having skills/tech used listed together with each job
imo the most important info on resume is
1. work experience (pet projects/contributions to open source if you're big nerdo)
2. location/timezone
3. name and contacts
It's based off of some latex template that looks roughly like this: https://www.overleaf.com/latex/templates/cv-template-using-t...
(then, of course, there are cultural differences between countries re: how a résumé should or should not look, but that's another matter)
[EDIT] My point is that it's entirely possible this style is loved by some readers, and hated by others. Any (reasonable) formatting or content you pick is going to impress some readers while turning off others. It's dumb, it's frustrating, it's inefficient, it's unfair—but that's how it is.
But I think you should never put your picture on a CV. I think it just puts you at a disadvantage, you have no idea what unconscious biases people have when reviewing CV's. Definitely not worth the risk.
You can also build a resume with it (and you can self host it if you want)
Interesting counter point. Thanks for the tips!
But on topic - as an admin or developer, style just doesn't matter to me beyond an initial notice of "This looks nice" or so. To me it borders more on a good sign if I can recognize that someone just shoved something through asciidoc to get a PDF.
I much rather care if the CV is put together well and doesn't look sloppy. We had one CV come in that had just broken formatting - linebreaks in headings inside words, typos and such. That's not a good flag. Like, if you can't care to move a linebreak in a CV 8 characters earlier for the same overall space used, what'll you do with critical production data?
And beyond that, the focus in CVs to me is to be easy to skim. A good CV allows me to look at the positions for a minute or so and I can get an initial idea that they're a good fit for something the team needs and I should spend more time on this candidate.
But that being sad, the CVs I got based on novoresume minimalist or elementary were on the good and effective side.