I'm pretty sure an average of 1-2C difference in under a century has happened before, without influence of humans.
This certainly does not look like a difference of one or two degrees per century. Regardless which is the actual increase of the average temperature, there can be no doubt that this is a dramatic change which will have unpredictable consequences and also that at least during the last few thousands of years there has never been a so great temperature change.
Do you trust your government's historic weather statistics?
And your response is useful. “From reading”.
Relative to tens of thousands of scientists of diverse fields, educational backgrounds, affiliated institutions, geographical regions, areas of study, environments of study, experimental approaches, data sources, mathematical analysis, and lots of reading, etc. basing a contrarian view on some reading is inadequate as a credible rebuttal.
For the most part, people on this site are looking for greater insight, not greater expression of personal opinions.
The comment OP called trolling would be much stronger and more interesting if it posted a "credible rebuttal" instead of being snarky and rude. If that hits an issue with the bullshit asymmetry principle[1] for you, downvote and move on with your life.
I see your points but this comes over very low on the snarky scale to me. More Socratic.
It is also a point (expertise matters) that seems to be especially overlooked in climate change discussions.
I also didn’t see how downvoting someone for not picking up on a point helps anything.
And I don’t see anything written to be unkind. Directness isn’t unkindness.