IoSafe 1522 NAS Review Synology Powered Fireproof and Waterproof NAS
servethehome.com
servethehome.com
The Curie temp of hard drives seems to be quite low, depending on the exact platter formulation. A target temp of ~800C is far too high. In a hot fire, I wouldn't expect the data to last more than 10-15 mins,
72 hrs of water protection might be enough.
But this still makes less sense than keeping copies of data off-prem somewhere - preferably a very very long way away.
And preferably multiple copies.
There may be reasons (privacy, security...) why you might not want to do that. But still. An encrypted off-prem solution, even if it's multiple NAS boxes in various offices and not a cloud thing, is going to be far more robust than a drive safe.
A much better option would be to buy a gun safe from Costco or the like with a large internal volume and ethernet/power passthrough ports. The air inside will act as an additional insulating layer buying you time.
Isn't the autoignition temperature of paper like a third of that?
Well, no. Actually it's a bit more variable than that, but "Between Fahrenheight 424 and Fahrenheight 475" doesn't make as punchy a book title for some reason.
https://ftloscience.com/flash-points-autoignition-fahrenheit...
Can you imagine being on the engineering team for this thing and NOT fire testing it? That's the fun part!
Maybe it’s just me, but seems like a bit of a design oversight to mount everything at the bottom.
In the event of a flood surrounding a potentially sealed box, having the cables further up might just make all the difference, right?
But from a cursory read, it seems they are mostly interested in ensuring only the spinning disks are safe (the SSDs are outside the sealed box, with the board).
Trying. It does not look fire proof to me, especially the power supply. Did they ever tried to submerge it in a pool for 72 hours. They forgot to say also if those specs are operating or nonoperating.
> The concept is more that one can pull the drives out, put them in another Synology NAS, and be up and running quickly after a fire.
The only thing I can think of is CCTV footage that might be too heavy to transfer over slow links in remote locations.