When we sell our public investments for a quick buck we complain when the real cost of the service gets priced in. The trouble is, we pay the same taxes still, they just no longer go to the service we privatised, so we feel it in the pocketbook individually.
Presumably those taxes are going elsewhere now, but I was very happy with them going to core public services.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/usps-louis-dejoy-post-offic...
I, for one, think it's a good thing that people are entitled to their mail regardless of the profitability of their mail route. That's the point of a public service.
Among other core competencies, USPS has nationwide daily coverage of the entire United States and centuries(?) of experience interoperating the the respective mail services of every country in the world and then some.
Amazon wont even take MY package one town over.
That said, the service provided by the USPS nowadays is primarily delivery of paper waste into a receptacle I am obligated to empty because very occasionally they also use the same box for packages.
USPS is not a business, and it’s a fundamental mistake to pretend it is, solely for the sake of slandering it.
Amtrak gets surprisingly small amount of money.
However that doesn't change what I said so I'm not sure why you are bringing it up. Amtrak most likely wouldn't be profitable if they had priority.
Each big city we came to we had to stop and wait without having any idea how long it would take for “freight traffic to clear”.
I love train travel, and I’m not price sensitive at all, but the delays were completely absurd.
USPS delivers to remote addresses no one else’s will on route that will never make money.