Hacker News Reader

Comment by JoeAltmaier | Hacker News Reader

Let me explain then.

Automation, increased productivity continue to rise at least as fast. Not clear we won't be fine simply because of that.

And No we do not have to chase the Malthusian Catastrophe to 'win'. We can do it other ways. Quelling consumerism. Reigning in capitalism. Sensibly designing cities.

The Japanese talk only of extinction of the pure Japan, which is on the face of it a racist policy. Not a real strong point in the argument. Japan will persist, with a normal mix of people from around the world creating a new culture that they want. Not something frozen in time that the octogenarians of Japan worship and cling onto.

View on HN

> The Japanese talk only of extinction of the pure Japan

> Japan will persist

> with a normal mix of people from around the world

> creating a new culture

So what you're saying is the actual japanese people will go extinct and all the immigrants who actually have children will replace them and create a new japanese culture.

And you see nothing wrong with that at all.

Why would there be anything wrong with it? This is the way cultures and people have changed since time immemorial.

> This is the way cultures and people have changed since time immemorial.

Yeah, because some empire came and killed your people off and conquered your lands and enslaved your survivors and erased your culture so they could replace it their own.

Not because people wiped themselves off the map because they wouldn't have children.

Cultures are and always have been constantly shifting and changing; conquest is one method of that happening, as you point out, but is far from the only one. Immigration, emigration, catastrophe, technological progress, climate change... all result in the movement of people and the shifting of national and cultural boundaries.

No culture is "erased" as a result of this. Even if Japan fails to have children, Japanese culture and the Japanese nation will continue. It will look different, certainly. But there's nothing magical or better about the way things used to be simply because they used to be that way. Change is inevitable, and more than that, it is good.

> Even if Japan fails to have children, Japanese culture and the Japanese nation will continue.

No. Nations are a collection of people with shared ethnicity, land, culture, language, history. If the japanese people disappear, the nation will also disappear. It's not going to magically continue just because the country of Japan is still there. Can't have a nation without its people.

No. Nations are lines drawn on a map. The people inside need have nothing in common other than geographic proximity.

Japan will exist as long as people live there and call it Japan. It has nothing to do with ethnicity, land, culture, or history.

Nonsense.

> nation

> A people who share common customs, origins, history, and frequently language

There are nations without states. There are also nation states. The latter is more precise than country which does not imply any dominant ethnic group.

If you don’t have the intellectual capacity to continue that’s okay. I understand ethnostatists get easily confused by ambiguity and historical fact.

I'm not confused at all. I have no reason to doubt my understanding of things at this time. First you redefined words and contradicted dictionary and encyclopedic definitions of simple concepts and terms. Now you're calling me a stupid, confused, mentally incapable "ethnostatist". This borders on gaslighting.

More alarmist hyperbole. I know of several Japanese families in my hometown, come here to study, and they are doing fine.

So what? My hometown was literally built by the japanese. My parents worked with japanese their entire lives. Sometimes I go to a restaurant and I hear people speaking japanese nearby. They're all doing fine too.

Doesn't change the fact birth rates in Japan are below replacement. Am I missing something here?

Extinction means more than 'below replacement'. Things change; culture changes. It's the lowering population figures that will require change that the octogenarians fear, not actual non-existence of a Japanese people. All the rest of this thread has been disingenuous hyperbole based on that.

I saw a Javan Rhinos the other day. He seemed to be doing pretty good.

> > The Japanese talk only of extinction of the pure Japan

> > Japan will persist

The point is that they aren't doing well on the "persist" front. https://apnews.com/article/japan-birth-rate-record-low-popul...

That's typical hyperbole, and not moving the discussion forward.

Nobody, not even the Japanese government expects that. They are anticipating a difficulty maintaining their culture against mixing with the world. Which has actually been going on for 70 years now, and continues at a breakneck pace.

Japanese people will come to include all sorts of people, who will happily live together and move forward. Without our permission or control, as folks all over the world do.

> Nobody, not even the Japanese government expects that.

Are you sure?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-64373950

> They are anticipating a difficulty maintaining their culture against mixing with the world.

Of course. If you don't have children, then you need immigration from countries that do. That will obviously change your culture.

A nation is made up of people of a shared origin, history, culture, ethnicity, language. If you replace the people with immigrants and they create a new culture, the nation is no more.

> Japanese people will come to include all sorts of people, who will happily live together and move forward.

That's like saying white people will come to include all sorts of people.

Culture is changing constantly; the idea that there's a fixed point there is absurd, because again, there is nothing inherent to a nation other than lines drawn on an arbitrary map.

White people already do include all sorts of people -- whiteness is, obviously, not a single unified ethnicity, national, cultural, linguistic, or historical background but an aesthetic conception of someone's skin color. Because ethnostatism is stupid and intellectually inconsistent.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com