Don't think I'm too crazy but last time I checked:
1. Yes they are microcontrollers.
2. Yes they use C/C++. (check the libraries/SDKs, 1 layer under the hood it's all .h/.cpp files, and most of the arduino calls are just #defines)
1. Yes they are microcontrollers.
2. Yes they use C/C++. (check the libraries/SDKs, 1 layer under the hood it's all .h/.cpp files, and most of the arduino calls are just #defines)
I don't understand why you're trying to cherry-pick like this.
"Their libraries are written in/for C"
Also, you've deliberately chosen a specific interpretation of my statement in order to manufacture an argument that doesn't exist. You should probably avoid doing that in the future.
I avoid whatever I feel like.
It's almost like I have some domain knowledge that you don't. Imagine coming in here with examples that aren't even microcontrollers as if that "debunks" what I said above. Like somehow magically I can just switch to a whole different platform. No problem, just crank out a new board spin and swap my whole toolchain over so I can... what... use a non-standard version of C in the arduino IDE for production code? If you think THAT'S a viable option, you've lost your mind.
Why continue to double down when you clearly have no idea what you're talking about?
> I avoid whatever I feel like.
You should "feel like" avoiding inventing arguments that hinge on misinterpretations of other people's statements. The fact that you don't makes you a problem.
Meanwhile, I can't avoid C even if I "feel like it"... because I write code for microcontrollers... which have libraries that are written in and for C.
2. Yes they use C/C++"
So how it is?
Why continue to double down when you clearly have no idea what you're talking about?
Those are not my words.
The things you mentioned aren't both microcontrollers, and they use C.
Why continue to double down when you clearly have no idea what you're talking about?