Companies that collect that data: "Dear Congressperson, here are 100,000 donated reasons to ignore the obvious and reasonable answer"
There are actually a bunch of really compelling strategic level national security style reasons to come to the same conclusion, it’s not purely just a consumer rights issue.
Firstly, it'd be nice if those national security reasons were clearly stated without the other bullshit. Secondly, as far as I've heard, there's no real success story for all the dragnet surveillance. If there's a legitimate application that is too broad that a warrant for targeted surveilance doesn't cover it, I'd like to hear it.
And until those other interest ^Hbribe their congress people, or said congress peoples data leaks to the world in a way they are effected on re-election they will be ignored by said people that make our laws.
Think tanks: "Congresspeople, here's some compelling word salad designed by the best. You can memorize and repeat this while pocketing 100,000 donated reasons from one of our funders."