I don't see any antidote to the effects of AI on society except regulation. This is a good first step forward, but it needs to go further.
i want a highly biased sample of attributes in the extreme tail end which will have all sorts of weirdness in it.
at least 2/3 of the population are unteachable for the management/engineering i want.
i don't want applicants that look anything like normal.
is that now illegal?
Which part of the article did you skip?
Start with the part where AI hiring tools favor people named "Jared."
If you’re saying humans are consciously hiring people named Jared, they shouldn’t be allowed to provide hiring feedback.
(Or the AI was used incompetently. That's always an option. Was AI the reason why US universities discriminated illegally against non-blacks and non-hispanics? I really doubt it.)