> This is simply not true. So sad.

Ah sorry, so, just coincidentally pydantic happened to be slower than any other library that had a PR to be added to the benchmark, but that was not the reason they were rejected.

Better now?

> Please show me a sensible benchmark where your library is faster than pydantic?

    $ python3 perftest/realistic\ union\ of\ objects\ as\ namedtuple.py --pydantic
    (1.2192879340145737, 1.2595951650291681)
    $ python3 perftest/realistic\ union\ of\ objects\ as\ namedtuple.py --typedload
    (1.0874736839905381, 1.114147917018272)

I'm not a math genius but I'm fairly sure that 1.08 is less than 1.21.

So much for your invite to be gentle and cooperative :D (https://github.com/ltworf/typedload/pull/422)