Saying social 'science', gives the credibility of science.
Heck, I'd really like a scale that can measure the credibility. P values are a bandaid.
For instance, chemistry is pretty solid science right? Well, if you make polyurethane in a box, the 'same way' each time, you are going to have bubbles in seemingly random locations, with maybe some correlation. Whatever the case, its not perfectly repeatable due to macro scale complexities.
I don't think this would do too much for the scientific community, because most are aware. But I do think it would help teenagers understand the difference.
I cringe whenever I hear things like "But it was peer reviewed and in this fancy journal". Yeah give me replication and I'll take a look.