Justin.TV as a country
abstractstuff.livejournal.com
abstractstuff.livejournal.com
right?
No, of course not. So they've hit user #2,500,000. How many of those users are active? Last day? Seven days? How many actually broadcast?
You are correct user numbers are exciting but not everything.
One number that we use to gauge overall usage of the site is the total amount of video watched per month. It can be argued that for an online video site - the volume of video watched is the primary metric by which to define the success of the product.
In October 2008 there were over 2000 years of video watched on Justin.tv.
2000 years equals:
24,000 months 720,000 days 17,280,000 hours 1,036,800,000 minutes
Everyday over 570,000 hours of video are watched on the Justin.tv live video network.
That is quite a feat for an 11 person company don't you think?
And I don't really have that many users. 1,840~ activated users at last count. Which puts me between Niue and the Falkland Islands :D
2000 Years of video watching a month comes out to about 7 hours/month/user.
5.7 Million hours a day comes out to over 2 hours/day/user, or about 60 hours/month/user.
I think one of those numbers is off by an order of magnitude ... Or is my my math wrong?
Is the 5.7 Million hours of video/day number right, or is the 2000 Years of video/month right?
2000 Years of video/month only works out to half a million hours per day ... not 5 million. They still differ by an order of magnitude.
Thanks :)
As Michael says, a better way to measure the success of a video site is probably how much video people are watching. I posted this mostly just for the fun of comparing us to different countries, not because I think it's the best way to measure our site.
I would bet that the average Justin.tv user is more actively involved in JTV than the average Latvian is involved in Latvia. I mean, sure, they report 2.3 million registered residents, but how many of them voted in the last day? Last seven days? How many of them actually run for office?
You don't have to lead or influence leaders to contribute, and I think contribution is the key to the ajkirwin's point.