There’s also the thing where that’s a positive feedback look and we overflow the worlds corpus with garbage.
There’s also the thing where that’s a positive feedback look and we overflow the worlds corpus with garbage.
I've seen answers like this in Stack Overflow before. Technically correct, but basically broken in every other way: cybersecurity's future is gonna be interesting.
client=boto3.client(<service>, access-key,secret-key)
There is never a reason to include those last two parameters. It’s always a security risk no matter how you do it.In the past few months AWS has added to their UI a popup box that asks you why you are creating access keys, it makes you answer it before generating the keys. Once you give it the answer it tells you better ways to do almost anything you're trying to do, and you have to agree to ignore those suggestions one more time before actually generating the keys.
Basically the standard access keys are really of no use anymore. You should be using roles, OIDC, IAM Identity Center, cognito federated identities, or something else. There are a million ways to identify yourself that are more secure than that and I wish tutorials stopped assuming that you should generate access keys because in no practical 2023 use case should you be doing that anymore. Especially not in any sort of sensitive or corporate environment.
Have you ever noticed how the dumbest people tend be be the loudest, most confident, and most eager to share their opinions? Those are the voices that trained ChatGPT.
It’s a hard pass for me, but I fear I’m going to be forced to used it because the dumbest half of humanity will view it as a peer and use it for everything.