Shouldn't this void the arbitration clause and allow it to be heard in court?
"Quality" being the explicit delineator?
Surely there aren't many powerful and good law firms who would lie to themselves and say, "Yeah, sure, Elon's not paying his bills, but whether or not I get him off the hook this time, he'll definitely pay me because otherwise I'll sue him, too?"
A few million to a law firm now that could save paying tens of millions to laid-off employees later? That's a no-brainer for for the kind of company that considers non-payment to be an acceptable business practice to bully vendors into giving them better terms.