What is? His ruling? The government has no free speech.
Just going off the article it’s talking about preventing unelected officials from limiting the free speech of citizens via back channel communication with social media companies. Elected officials representing their constituents has nothing to do with this.
This violates all sorts of legal precedent and will likely be overturned.
Even Republicans would vehemently object to having similar applied to them so why bother promoting this sort of partisan gamesmanship? Is this what they call "leadership"?
Point to the part of the decision that says that as your take is apparently more partisan than CNN.