Recession canceled? U.S. stock market 'frothy' after S&P 500's strong first half
marketwatch.com
marketwatch.com
We've got student loan payments resuming soon, a steady stream of commercial real estate mortgages that are refinancing at higher rates for the next year or two, a population who's wages are still on average lower than they were pre-pandemic after adjusting for inflation, supply chain whip-saws as supply/demand continues to over/undershoot in some sectors, the federal reserve saying another couple of hikes are in order this year, and the boomers continuing to age into mass-retirement.
You want to dollar cost average into the market fine, but I wouldn't take out any margin loans for at least the next year.
At this point the market is essentially a drug addict that just got a shot of Narcan and rather than atone for its sins, has gotten excited that it’s going to live long enough to get at least one more hit.
There’s no discipline, no long term, fundamental thinking. Everyone is (and has been for a few decades) just another ape from r/WallStreetBets, even if he or she is wearing a suit and goes to work in a fancy office tower.
What the market seems to be conveniently ignoring is that a world where the Fed allows itself to be "forced" into lowering rates to near-zero again is a world where the Fed largely ceases to be relevant. So the Fed is, IMO, going to keep rates at least where they are if not higher if for no other reason than self-preservation. They'll have to see complete market capitulation before they'll consider lowering again.
Besides, one of their mandates is price stability. If they lower rates again, guess what happens? More inflation, and then they have to raise rates again because Congress certainly isn't capable of doing anything about it.
We obviously could still have a recession in the future but (a) we're not in one right now and (b) the economy has done much, much better than people were expecting this time last year.
Under the hood these numbers are not good.
Edit: Also wanted to throw this in: Average weekly hours of all employees https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/AWHAETP
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/u6rate
https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-lab...
Source? The BLS definition for U3 (ie. the figure that's referenced when people talk about "unemployment") doesn't say anything about 6 months.
However, there are certain factors that can lead to individuals falling out of the official unemployment statistic:
Discouraged Workers: If individuals become discouraged and stop actively seeking employment, they may no longer be counted as part of the labor force or in the unemployment rate calculation.
Underemployed Workers: The unemployment rate may not fully capture those who are working part-time but would prefer full-time employment. These individuals are considered part of the employed category, even if their work hours are insufficient.
Marginally Attached and Particular Job Seekers: Some individuals may have searched for employment in the past but have not actively sought employment in the four weeks preceding the survey. They are classified as marginally attached to the labor force and are not considered part of the unemployed category.
Involuntary Part-Time Workers: People who are working part-time due to economic reasons, such as inability to find full-time work, are included in the employed category but may not be fully reflected in the unemployment rate.
Sure things could stay positive for a while longer, but there's a lot of headwinds on the horizon, more than I've seen in a while, and these headwinds are tangible, concrete, structural things we can put some numbers to, not just vague philosophical notions of "it can't go up forever" and "everything's overvalued". How big an impact it all makes and on what timescale we'll have to just wait and see, but I'm not leveraging up in this environment.
The actual saying was a knock against stock traders:
> To prove that Wall Street is an early omen of movements still to come in GNP, commentators quote economic studies alleging that market downturns predicted four out of the last five recessions. That is an understatement. Wall Street indexes predicted nine out of the last five recessions! And its mistakes were beauties.[20]
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Samuelson#Aphorisms_and_q...
Anecdotally, got laid off in early spring, still trying to land a decent job, but despite the so called labor shortage all I get is shit offers for 2018 money. While I'm sure this benefits some, the fact that the stock market is now up, is little comfort to me.
On the ground here we were at 3 typical incomes to make basic bills in Jan 2022. As of this month we're solidly at 4 incomes to meet those same bills. Most of that jump occurred this year.
Yes.
> are you or people you know taking multiple jobs
That would work too, providing there enough hours in the week to work 4 full time jobs. One person earning 4x a typical income would also be able support themselves.
US household median income is about $71k/year. You're saying you need $280k to meet basic bills?
Perhaps by "typical" you meant something closer to "near minimum" ?
OTOH, the median is the number for which half the households in the country earn more and half earn less, and whatever the merits of the mode might be, I still think that's a fairly significant value too.
I'm not pitting it against BoL Statistics metrics. I use it to better communicate how the largest swath of the public experiences the economy.
The actual mode is going to be a single number, not a range, and it will correspond to very few people's incomes. To be usable in the way you mean, you need to add a range to it, and the size of that range is up for debate (mode +/- 1000? 2000? 10,000 ? etc)
I get that. However, that income doesn't reflect the largest bracket of the working population.
It isn't because so few employers pay that. The most available rate of pay would be closer to 10 or maybe 12 an hour.
Higher interest rates can be planned for already has a location in the tax code.
I’m staring to see that the recent recovery funding was a cash infusion to mask the rate increase from the 2008 recovery.
It is a great opportunity to reset expectations.
I think it's more nuanced in the types of employment and pay. But I'm also sure I don't even know where to go to get that data.
Isn't that the sign of a good economy then?
Ah yes, the fruits of Bidenomics!
Real wages are stagnant so everyone has to pick up additional work to deal with inflation. In a backdrop of inflation, these are essentialy a drop in wages: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/realer.pdf
Inflation is down: sure, from a face-ripping to a merely painful number. More importantly, it took several revisions to the CPI calculation and the lowest SPR levels in decades to make it happen. Also conveniently ignored, food CPI is still at a crushing 6.7% annual rate. If you remove food and energy, CPI inflation is at 5.3%. See: https://www.bls.gov/cpi/
Consumer spending is all-time high: indeed. Sky-high! It becomes quite nefarious when you think about the above: inflation of very important things is still high, but wages are not keeping up. How is the American consumer trying to stay afloat? Household debt. That is credit cards and other forms of personal debt has hit an all time high: https://www.newyorkfed.org/microeconomics/hhdc
I understand that Biden is trying to paint this as a success, but it's just cherry-picking statistics that hide the disaster the Democrats have created. It's like the Weimar Republic celebrating that the stock market is at all time high and unemployment is 0%.
Interest rates surprises suck. But the market purges the shit companies and adjusts. The economy was doing fine back in 2005 when rates were high too.
So I hear you, but one must learn stonkz go up…even if you don’t like it.
And interest rates aren't coming down any time soon, I just posted an article from a pair of Fed economists that predict rates being held high until 2026 (I expect we hit a recession which hurries that up, but nothing is going to hurry that up short of a recession).
Six months ago I borrowed 3 years of my gross income (principal and interest, not margin) to buy more low cost index funds. The loan period is 10 years which was the max available. I fully intend to pay it off over 10 years, no faster. Wish me luck!
In the S&P 500, the “Magnificent 7” stocks (NVIDIA, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Meta, Tesla, and Amazon) are responsible for *85%* of YTD gains.
Coatue’s East Meets West macro view from June 30 is the source for the above, and it contains a number of great insights: https://www.coatue.com/blog/company-update/coatues-2023-emw-...
I also realized the linked sourced from Coatue hasn’t been on HN and is a good source for independent discussion like this. Submitted: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36565261
Unless you happen to believe that climate change is real, and market-based pressure is useful in its mitigation.
If we reach 2025 and there's no 2000 style recession, this is the most likely cause. The recession is happening industry-by-industry and at different speeds. Some are sharp and fast (commodities), some are slow (commercial real estate), some happened early (tech), some happened late or haven't even happened yet (hospitality).
It also makes sense from a first principles standpoint: If everyone saw it coming due to covid, different industries will react differently, but every industry would definitely act. The difference between now vs '08 and 2000 is information availability, both from the obviousness of the catalyzing event and how ubiquitous financial information has become in the past 15 years.
Even as recently as 2008 it was considerably harder to find and act on economic data vs today. Most companies of any size can discover and act on economic data based on how they see fit. Given this, it's not shocking that tech acted first given they have immediate pricing effects and have information-driven cultures. Compare that to CRE where contracts span decades, and pricing is opaque by design.
Change my mind?
"Economic data released in the past week showed a revised estimate for U.S. growth in the first quarter was higher than anticipated; new orders for manufactured durable goods were stronger than expected in May; sales of newly built homes that same month beat economists’ forecasts; consumer confidence jumped in June to a 17-month high based on a Conference Board survey; and that initial jobless claims in the week ending June 24 fell... U.S. inflation measured by the personal-consumption-expenditures price index softened to 3.8% in May on a 12-month basis, the slowest increase since April 2021, based on a government report Friday."
Also, the "recession canceled" remark wasn't based on the S&P. It's from the chief global economist at Economic Outlook Group LLC -- a quote from the analysis he sent to investors Thursday. (He followed his "recession canceled" remark by citing the larger economy's "impressive performance the first three months," and drops in "virtually every inflation metric.")
Could it also be that the two-year yield is higher (than the 10-year yield) because people expect the fed to lower the FFR after a couple of years after inflation has reached their target?
This is a weak argument and the evidence does not support it: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/T10Y2Y
Or, a signal of the tail end of an undeclared recession.
If you compare unemployment rate to recessions, they usually begin before the unemployment spike. The unemployment spike then usually plateus around the end of the recession.
The ops guys lost 45% of headcount to retirement and turnover. Even with significantly increased pay, qualified candidates don’t exist. We’re trying to hire high school grads, community college kids, and separated veterans to pay to train, but any smart candidate is in demand. Automation and AI may reduce labor demand by about 20%, which isn’t enough.
We found in the high school recruiting that the state of affairs is so poor that you are basically looking for unicorns who undervalue themselves. The median high school grad in a large urban school is… pretty rough in terms of skills.
participants needed to find a way to trade without guaranteed liquidity and they did
not all markets are in bull runs, the credit markets are still declining, housing market is still pulling back, commercial is still hanging by a thread
I prefer Vanguard because it's a private company that is not beholden to shareholders. (disclaimer: I don't own any equity or work for Vanguard).
Some people buy video games, some people fancy car hobbies, I like buying stocks.
Stock prices are the measure, and the measure is manipulated.
Most of the listed companies are global after all.