The only problem might be the software patents that their code leverages.
The only problem might be the software patents that their code leverages.
Unless you mean that someone could see that you implemented their patent and retroactively go to sue them?
A patent is a method, not an implementation.
> The only problem might be the software patents that their code leverages.
We are talking about patents because Wengo brought it up and I was asking how they are applicable here.
In other words, the patent licensee may have a license to write and distribute their specific piece of software, but not to sublicense that to other people to write their own software, just to use the parent company's patent license. That is actually probably a common patent-license scenario, microsoft doesn't automatically get sublicensing rights just because they bought software developed by a licensee.
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20180515-00/?p=98...