But my friend living in the South of Belgium, who spoke French, got plenty more.
If a scammer employs Flemish / Dutch speaking people they'll have a small target audience.
For Dutch you're looking at 25 million potential L1 targets [1].
However do that for French and all of the sudden you have about 80 million L1 potential targets [2]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_language [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_language
Yeah, they could call a German and try to scam them in English, but that's probably less likely to work than scamming somebody in their native language.
I think it’s much more common in English speaking countries because collectively they’re the most attractive target with 450m+ wealthy consumers.
Unfortunately that law only works for land lines. Cell phone spam was virtually unknown 20 years ago because cellular minutes were not free, and anybody who wasted your time on a cell call could be sued for costing you money. Also back in those days there were no comprehensive databases mapping people to mobile numbers. Finally there didn't exist easy ways of spoofing your caller ID number so if you spammed someone you would likely be caught.
That's all different now, which is why the old law needs to be updated for mobile phones.
Of course, that list is dead in the water. It has to be _bought_ by companies trying to call people and no effort is being done to make the existence of the list known to the public.
"Surprisingly", the board of the non-profit managing the list consists of representatives from call-centers, marketing associations and telco's.
(I had a major run-in with them once, because their previous website allowed adding phone numbers to the do-not-call-list without verification. So I tried adding all of Belgium's phone numbers with a script).