Be worried about what’s going on at Turner Classic Movies
npr.org
npr.org
The only other cable channel I can think of that remains as committed to its original purpose as TCM is C-SPAN which still airs neutral and non-partisan coverage of politics as it happens (which is usually more boring than watching paint dry but very useful whenever something big and important is actually happening). So it is not good news that Warner Bros management, fresh off destroying a bunch of works of art for a tax writeoff, is now turning its attention to TCM to "fix" a channel that isn't broken. We all know where that slippery slope ends if/when they decide TCM "needs to draw higher ratings to increase ad revenue": a weekly All Elite Wrestling program on TCM (not unprecedented given that NBC once aired a WWE program on the science fiction channel).
Besides, given his space adventure both on TV and real life, it makes far more sense to have him talk of weird/mysterious/beautiful things in the Universe. Not a very general tale of Mothman.
The rise of reality and outrage shows in the last couple decades really dimmed my view on the public at large.
Just one example out of thousands of how the Internet can do this a lot better than cable.
If you run a "discovery channel" your task should be to maximize the performance of that niche, not just throw up your hands and decide to just show whatever performs well. I'm surprised they havent just started showing softcore porn. That'll probably get viewers too.
What set TCM apart were the interludes where the host explains the background of how the stories came about, where the directors were in their careers when the film was made. Just really insightful stuff.
HBO has always stood for premium entertainment for adults. There are other sides to the brand, for example children's programming. Ultimately premium programming is the biggest pull of HBO, not the other stuff. By naming the streaming service meant to convey the whole of Warner Bros. catalogue, and now on top of that Discovery as well, is a mistake. It enlarges the brand too much, too quickly. It puts under the umbrella of HBO things that people do not associate with HBO. Porky Pig cartoons don't fit under HBO. Discovery's wall of cheap reality TV even less.
A counter-argument is Disney. Disney+ includes a ton of things that are traditionally not associated with the brand. But I say that it no longer applies. Disney has successfully enlarged their branding, you just haven't fully realized it yet. That larger umbrella for the company was built over two decades, and cost billions. It was built on the back of Marvel and Lucasfilm. HBO is not there yet.
Its main viewership is dying. Not to overuse the word “literally,” but, literally dying.
Live cable is basically the worst way to watch a movie I you can imagine at this point. I love all the kind words about curation but hello have you ever heard of the Internet? There is no shortage of sources of movie curation all better than anything a mass-market cable channel can offer.
I think ultimately TCM needs to be reallocated into something that fits live cable better, possibly not even related to movies. Longer term, I don’t think most cable stations will exist at all. They will be content portals for the various media conglomerates like we see on streaming sites. I think that cable service as we understand it now will essentially be shut down. Just look at the free “cable” services out there like Pluto. They’re all pseudo-channels pieced together with a grab bag of content.
I’ve also got a bit of an unpopular opinion here: the Max rebrand makes a ton of sense. Why? Because the “HBO” Brand is associated with adult shows, i.e., R-rated content. This is a problem. Did you know Max is the streaming home of Sesame Street? Yeah, that used to have the HBO brand on it.
HBO Max got to the point where most of its content isn’t even from HBO. Making the streaming service a separate brand from the content sources makes perfect sense.
I can’t understand how you you tolerate or prefer this setup, whether it be now or in the past.
One tidbit that I learned: “A Star Is Born” has been remade three times (not including the original), with releases in 1937, 1954, 1976, and 2018.
Only in the mind of NPR. CNN was damaged goods long before this.