Judging by this ruling, evidently not.
The reality I was referring to was the reality of Congress having delegated this authority to the Executive Branch. Read the dissent if you haven't.
The delegation of authority happened in 2003. It was broad. The delegated authority had been exercised before.
The current Court is just hell-bent on dismantling the ability of the Executive Branch to regulate based on delegated authority.
It wasn't this broad.
> The delegated authority had been exercised before.
Never this broadly.
The reality is that this was a huge overstep by the administration. The majority is correct.
The reality is that this court is increasingly corrupt and going over their authority. And they should be reigned in.