Just one datapoint/anecdote, but it's a far cry from the last few years in my experience.
Just one datapoint/anecdote, but it's a far cry from the last few years in my experience.
It's been frustrating seeing a few friends try to buy a home in the past couple years, but basically get steamrolled at every turn because they aren't willing to drop all their income on a home purchase sight-unseen.
I can list a random suburban property for 100MM USD, and will have to drop the asking price by over 99%. The horrors! But it tells you nothing about the market.
My point is that without more context, e.g. how realistic that price would have been 3 months ago, it's not a meaningful statement.
My mental model of housing in my area is that I have the n-th salary in that area, so I get the n-th best flat. The pricing will then be exactly what I can afford (which is legally 35% of my salary here). What changes is who gets how much, 3 years ago it would go at 95% to the previous owner, nowadays it's 70%.
If I think a house will sell for 100 units of value and I list it for 80 and sell for 100, it went for 125% of asking. If I list it for 125 and sell for 100, it went for 80% of listing. Nothing changed about the health or frothiness of the market; the only difference was my listing price strategy.