And they've just posted the article about how they plan to get the sources without violating the RH ToS:
How does this approach not require them to agree to the ToS/EULA mentioned earlier in the post?
They spined up an VM in some service that started an red hat image with the required license already in place for that image..
it is the vm provider that is bound by the EULA, not RockyLinux..
They are bound by the ToS for the VM provider they are using, that does not prevent them to get the sources from Red Hat..