Does MIDI 2 have broad vendor buy-in? We all know about Microsoft's history here.
Is MIDI 2 a good thing overall?
Does MIDI 2 have broad vendor buy-in? We all know about Microsoft's history here.
Is MIDI 2 a good thing overall?
But the big difference is that MIDI 2 is duplex (devices can send and receive messages from each other, rather than just broadcasting them into the void). This allows for discovery (devices can find each other on the same connection/network), capability inquiry (devices can get metadata about each other) and the super power: property exchange (get/set properties as JSON).
The reason the last bit is so big is because it fixes some giant issues with MIDI, like being unable to control the tuning system used by all the connected devices. With some conventions and the new protocol we should see MIDI 2 open up a lot of room for non-western and microtonalities without resorting to tedium or hacks.
But that's just an example. It's kind of like a binary protocol for hardware and software music devices that goes beyond basic performance controls.
"What Musicians & Artists need to know about MIDI 2.0": https://www.midi.org/midi-articles/what-musicians-and-artist...
Biggest promises on top of better data types is actual device discovery, so for example after connecting control keyboard to a synth you can have the knob names automatically populated. And no hacks needed to get MPE