> Wall-E is famously bifurcated, with the first half being a nearly dialogue-free tone poem and the latter half a (now PROBLEMATIC) story about saving humanity.
What's problematic about the second half of WALL-E?
What's problematic about the second half of WALL-E?
Maybe that's because none of the complaints it is reporting makes real sense?
The article, as I see it, is merely reporting on the controversy. They aren't making their own points, they are repeating the points made by others.
That's what news is supposed to be: report what is happening, not what you think.